The Human Offensive | February 7, 2025
By Daniel Taylor
The real driving force of the past 100 years has been a massive project launched in the early 19th Century by tax-exempt foundations to study the inner workings of mankind in order to better control him. USAID was one branch of this system.
The infamous National Security Study Memorandum 200, known as the Kissinger Report, outlined a depopulation plan for the planet in 1974. The bullet points in the document proposed using international aid as a weapon to coerce population control measures, and changing protein consumption patterns in the US.
The plan involved using USAID to “…reach and influence national leaders, improved world-wide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media and other population education…”
The document states that a growing number of “experts” believed that the population “problem” needed to be addressed with a heavy hand:
“The conclusion of this view is that mandatory programs may be needed and that we should be considering these possibilities now.
This school of thought believes the following types of questions need to be addressed:
- Should the U.S. initiate a major research effort to address the growing problems of fresh water supply, ecological damage, and adverse climate?
- Should the U.S. make an all out commitment to major limitation of world population with all the financial and international as well as domestic political costs that would entail?
- Should the U.S. set even higher agricultural production goals which would enable it to provide additional major food resources to other countries? Should they be nationally or internationally controlled?
- On what basis should such food resources then be provided? Would food be considered an instrument of national power? Will we be forced to make choices as to whom we can reasonably assist, and if so, should population efforts be a criterion for such assistance?
- Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?
- Should the U.S. seek to change its own food consumption patterns toward more efficient uses of protein?
- Are mandatory population control measures appropriate for the U.S. and/or for others?
- Should the U.S. initiate a major research effort to address the growing problems of fresh water supply, ecological damage, and adverse climate?
The real driving force of the past 100 years has been a massive project launched in the early 19th Century by tax-exempt foundations; Namely Rockefeller, Gates, and Carnegie. The project effectively drew the maps for society to follow, and injected an anti-human philosophy into every western institution. Globalist social engineering programs infiltrated every level of our society. Academic, scientific, corporate, governmental, and religious institutions were all touched by its influence. Population reduction was the primary goal.
The overarching ethos of this program was essentially anti human. It views humans as soul-less animals to be manipulated by a technocratic elite in pursuit of power.
USAID was one branch of this system.
Vaccines that sterilize women and cause spontaneous miscarriages came out of this system, as did massive projects that created deadly bioweapons world-wide.
A secret project to use biological weapons against Southeast Asia in 1947 by the Australian government was spawned by this program.