The Human Offensive | Oct. 22, 2024
By Daniel Taylor
1960s policies developed by globalist social engineers are in play right now. They wrote: “The logical target for legal and institutional pressures is the family: pressures to postpone marriages; economic pressures and inducements for married women to work outside the home; provision of free abortions for all women… downgrading of familial roles in comparison with extrafamilial roles; and restriction of housing and consumer goods…”
Vance’s proposal to “make it easier to make the choice of life” by reducing housing costs and promoting a pro-family culture is in direct opposition to globalist policies.
During a recent interview with ABC’s Martha Raddatz, Trump VP JD Vance was asked about women’s “individual rights” being violated, to which he responded,
“Donald Trump and I want to make it easier to make the choice of life in the first place. And I know a lot of young women, especially when I was younger, who chose abortion because they feel like they didn’t have any options… I’d like to make it easier for women to choose life to begin with. I think that goes to lowering the cost of housing… I think its making it easier for working moms to balance work and life and family. There’s a lot that we can do to become more pro-family.”
Deliberate reduction of living standards, targeting of family unit, install “totalitarian regime”
Far from being an accident, policies were developed decades ago to reduce American’s standard of living with the intent to reduce population. There was no discussion of women’s rights or liberation in these plans. They reveal the reality behind the propaganda; A cold, anti-human agenda.
In 1969, a paper titled “The Problem of Population Control” was written by Frank Notestein, Dudley Kirk and Sheldon Segal. The paper was written for The American Assembly think tank at Arden House, New York. The Assembly acted as an extension of the Anglo-American Establishment, much like the round table groups and Bilderberg meetings.
Frank Notestein was a major contributor to the development of demography as a science. He was the first director of the United Nations Population Division, established in 1946.
From 1947 to 1954 Dudley Kirk was the demographer in the Office of Intelligence Research of the US State Department.
In 1978, Sheldon Segal worked with the Rockefeller Foundation, serving as the Foundation’s first director of population sciences.
“The Problem of Population Control” paper presented to the Assembly outlined policy plans for reducing the human population, stating that “The only acceptable goal is zero rate of growth…”. To achieve these goals, the authors were shockingly honest:
“…even if successful, voluntary family planning programs cannot be expected to resolve the world population dilemma. Even in the more developed countries, and notably in the United States, surveys show couples desiring more children than are necessary for replacement… Thus we cannot rely on the self-interested choices of individual couples to meet society’s needs. The only acceptable goal is zero rate of growth because any rate of growth continued long enough leads to astronomical figures. Given existing preferences in family size, governments must go beyond voluntary family planning. To achieve zero rate of population growth governments will have to do more than cajole; they will have to coerce.”
The authors explicitly target the family unit with policies of abortion, taking women out of the home, and inducing economic pressures to limit growth. Ultimately, achieving these goals would require “…the institution of a totalitarian regime“:
“The logical target for legal and institutional pressures is the family: pressures to postpone marriages; economic pressures and inducements for married women to work outside the home; provision of free abortions for all women requesting them; downgrading of familial roles in comparison with extrafamilial roles; and restriction of housing and consumer goods… Such institutional changes supply motivation for family limitation and the provision of free abortions affords a means. The implications of such major institutional changes go far beyond population control. The family is the basic social unit of society and its major institution for the socialization of the children… to impose more drastic changes on a large scale implies many risks, not least to the regime that undertakes them. The price for this type of population control may well be the institution of a totalitarian regime.”
By reversing the predatory, anti-human policies of the globalists and shifting the culture back to being pro-family, making the choice of life will become easier.