The Human Offensive | December 10, 2023
By Daniel Taylor
“The only acceptable goal is zero rate of growth… provision of free abortions… restriction of housing and consumer goods… The price for this type of population control may well be the institution of a totalitarian regime.“
Humanity has become aware of the existence of these social engineers. It will take time to undo the embedded institutional anti-human agenda.
Social engineers have constructed our modern world in a way that is antithetical to human development. The state of the world in 2023 is the result of a long game, a deliberate sabotage of civilization set into motion many years ago. This was done on purpose. Human life has been devalued on purpose. The family structure has been destroyed on purpose. Artificial scarcity in the name of fighting global warming is done on purpose, with the intent of reducing our numbers. The Great Reset initiated by the World Economic Forum is a natural progression of the institutional inertia that began decades ago.
Policy plans were documented and written by little known historical figures. They had connections to the State department, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Eugenics movement.
In 1969, a paper titled “The Problem of Population Control” was written by Frank Notestein, Dudley Kirk and Sheldon Segal. The paper was written for The American Assembly think tank at Arden House, New York.
Frank Notestein was a major contributor to the development of demography as a science. He was the first director of the United Nations Population Division, established in 1946.
From 1947 to 1954 Dudley Kirk was the demographer in the Office of Intelligence Research of the US State Department.
In 1978, Sheldon Segal worked with the Rockefeller Foundation, serving as the Foundation’s first director of population sciences.
The Arden House
The Arden Estate was owned by the Harriman family, founders of the Eugenics Records Office at Cold Spring Harbor. The Arden House served as a gathering place for the Anglo American Establishment to discuss policy.
A 1991 video from CSPAN, sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations, tours the estate.
“The Problem of Population Control” paper presented to the Assembly in 1969 outlines policy plans and ideas for reducing the human population, stating that “The only acceptable goal is zero rate of growth…”. To achieve these goals, the authors were shockingly honest:
“…even if successful, voluntary family planning programs cannot be expected to resolve the world population dilemma. Even in the more developed countries, and notably in the United States, surveys show couples desiring more children than are necessary for replacement… Thus we cannot rely on the self-interested choices of individual couples to meet society’s needs. The only acceptable goal is zero rate of growth because any rate of growth continued long enough leads to astronomical figures. Given existing preferences in family size, governments must go beyond voluntary family planning. To achieve zero rate of population growth governments will have to do more than cajole; they will have to coerce.”
The authors explicitly target the family unit with policies of abortion, taking women out of the home, and inducing economic pressures to limit growth. Ultimately, achieving these goals would require “…the institution of a totalitarian regime“:
“The logical target for legal and institutional pressures is the family: pressures to postpone marriages; economic pressures and inducements for married women to work outside the home; provision of free abortions for all women requesting them; downgrading of familial roles in comparison with extrafamilial roles; and restriction of housing and consumer goods… Such institutional changes supply motivation for family limitation and the provision of free abortions affords a means. The implications of such major institutional changes go far beyond population control. The family is the basic social unit of society and its major institution for the socialization of the children… to impose more drastic changes on a large scale implies many risks, not least to the regime that undertakes them. The price for this type of population control may well be the institution of a totalitarian regime.”
Humanity has become aware of the existence of these social engineers. It will take time to undo the embedded institutional anti-human agenda.