The Human Offensive | November 15, 2023
By Daniel Taylor
The ripple effect of this program has sent waves to the present day, when the current global establishment is run by individuals who are completely bought in to this system of thought. The overarching ethos of this program was essentially anti human. It views humans as soul-less animals to be manipulated by a technocratic elite in pursuit of power.
An organized, predatory group of our fellow humans have decided that you are no longer necessary. Modern civilization has made you weak, and advances in technology render you obsolete.
The truth is, we have wonderful potential. We really can expand to other worlds. Before we can achieve this, humanity must first overcome the last hundred years of anti-human propaganda with a better worldview, and deal with consequences of the psychological, social, economic, and biological warfare that has been waged against us.
We need to have respect for ourselves, an appreciation of what our ancestors fought for, and a realization that we too have a place in history, as our posterity does in the future. As historian Alexis de Tocqueville found in his studies of human history and governance, rulers have always sought to repress the human spirit that threatens their domination. He writes in his 1840 book Democracy in America,
“He [The sovereign] does not break men’s wills but softens, bends, and guides them. He seldom forces anyone to act but consistently opposes action. He does not destroy things but prevents them from coming into being. Rather than tyrannize, he inhibits, represses, saps, stifles, and stultifies, and in the end he reduces each nation to nothing but a flock of timid and industrious animals, with the government as its shepherd.”
Rockefeller’s General Education Board, 1906: “In our dreams… people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands… We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science…”
Leftists have made profitable careers out of battling ghosts of institutional racism, transphobia and bigotry. Destructive forces have set the world on fire. They have whispered into the ears of groups of people with legitimate grievances to act out in destructive ways, and constructed entirely false narratives for others to embrace a victim mentality.
This campaign has resulted in further division, but most importantly it misses the target entirely.
Institutional Anti-Humanism
The real driving force of the past 100 years has been a massive project launched in the early 19th Century by tax-exempt foundations; Namely Rockefeller, Gates, and Carnegie. The project effectively drew the maps for society to follow, and injected an anti-human philosophy into every western institution. Globalist social engineering programs infiltrated every level of our society. Academic, scientific, corporate, governmental, and religious institutions were all touched by its influence. Eugenics and population reduction was the primary goal.
The overarching ethos of this program was essentially anti human. It views humans as soul-less animals to be manipulated by a technocratic elite in pursuit of power.
This can fairly be labeled as institutional anti-humanism, and it still holds power over us in almost every way.
Dr. Lily E. Kay’s 1993 book “The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology” documents much of the early history behind the rise of eugenics and life sciences. Kay demonstrates that the drive for social control and eugenics was largely responsible for the emergence and growth of the science of molecular biology.
A key portion of Dr. Kay’s book concludes that large foundations like the Rockefeller Foundation shaped the development of culture and production of knowledge in the United States:
“…by the end of the Progressive Era, even before the large-scale commitment to the “advancement of knowledge” spurred by World War I, the human sciences received considerable support from the large foundations. Their numerous projects and the unprecedented scope of their financial and institutional resources shaped the development of culture and the production of knowledge in the United States. Through education, public opinion, stimulation of specific research agenda, and the promotion of selective categories of knowledge and research, the Foundation played a key role in the creation of a hegemonic bloc; the resources and prestige flowing into those fields relevant to problems of social control were instrumental in the formation of consensus between social and political elites, on the one hand, and academic interests on the other.”
The physical makeup of human beings was studied, and methods to alter various biological processes were devised. The inertia generated by the Rockefeller project helped develop the eugenics movement in the United States. Outside of the physical properties of man, our very nature was targeted for radical change. The writings of Aldous Huxley, Julian Huxley (brother of Aldous and first director of UNESCO) H.G. Wells, and Bertrand Russell are all based on the machinations of this project of projects.
Charles Galton Darwin, grandson of Charles Darwin, wrote a book entitled The Next Million Years in 1952. By then the “Science of Man” project was well on its way. Darwin’s writes in The Next Million Years,
“…though it might conceivably be possible to tame the majority of mankind, this could only be done by leaving untamed a minority of the population. ”
Chester Bernard, who served as president of the Rockefeller Foundation from 1948-1952, was unquestionably a member of the establishment. He saw what the Rockefeller Foundation and much of the scientific community was attempting to do and spoke out against it, but couched his criticism with the assumption of pure motives. Bernard writes in the Rockefeller Foundation’s 1948 Annual Report,
“Inherent in our systematic efforts to promote the welfare of mankind there may be an assumption that… by reason and science we may govern the future of unborn generations in ways that we know are right… Do we mean that because we have learned to navigate the tides we shall also control them? … We have already begun the attempts to regulate local weather. Where do we think we shall stop — with the control of the speed of rotation of the earth, of its revolution around the sun? … Pride goeth before a fall.“
Dr. Kay comments on Bernard’s criticism, stating that, “Given this wisdom, it is paradoxical that Barnard did not hear the dissonance between his poignant words and the Rockefeller Foundation’s agenda in biology, where the primary justification for studying the fundamental mechanisms of soma and psyche was the promise of intervening in the course of human behavior on a global scale.”
The ripple effect of this program has sent waves to the present day, when the current global establishment is run by individuals who are completely bought in to this system of thought. Draining the swamp must include throwing out the entire thought system that has driven it.
Vaccines that sterilize women and cause spontaneous miscarriages came out of this system, as did massive projects that created deadly bioweapons world-wide.
Henry Kissinger’s notorious NSSM 200 came out of this institutional anti-humanism.
A secret project to use biological weapons against Southeast Asia in 1947 by the Australian government was spawned by this program.
The technological revolution currently enveloping the globe is rolling out as an anti human force. Big Tech, acting as an extension of globalist power, is seeking to draw humans into a matrix like existence while the real world crumbles.
We can course-correct and spark a new renaissance that views human beings as having immortal souls with innate value and potential. We have a spiritual element.
We can build up distinct individuals with the knowledge of their worth instead of creating mindless victims plagued by suicide and guilt.
We were simply not meant to live in constant comfort in an artificial environment. Our potential can never be fully expressed.
Technology needs to be developed for human exploration and colonization of space in a new frontier.
If we can throw off the chains of the present day scientific dictatorship, we can take heart knowing that we are not yet at the end of the wilderness road.
The change we need has to replace the false map we have been operating from.
C. S. Lewis, a prominent author and thinker who witnessed the rise of institutional anti-humanism, responded to it from a Christian perspective. He writes in Mere Christianity in 1952:
The reason why it can never succeed is this. God made us: invented us as a man invents an engine. A car is made to run on gasoline, and it would not run properly on anything else. Now God designed the human machine to run on Himself. He Himself is the fuel our spirits were designed to burn, or the food our spirits were designed to feed on… That is the key to history. Terrific energy is expended—civilizations are built up— excellent institutions devised; but each time something goes wrong. Some fatal flaw always brings the selfish and cruel people to the top and it all slides back into misery and ruin. In fact, the machine conks. It seems to start up all right and runs a few yards, and then it breaks down. They are trying to run it on the wrong juice. That is what Satan has done to us humans.
The “next step” already arrived
Lewis believed that the “next step” of our “evolution” had already happened, saying in 1944:
Now that’s just where Christianity, as I think, has the real answer to a question a lot of modern people are asking. Everyone’s heard of evolution, how man evolved from lower types of life. And people often ask, “What’s the next step?” “When is the thing beyond man going to appear?” Some imaginative writers even try to picture what the next step will be like, but they usually end in nonsense about men with six arms or wings or something of that type. But the Christians think those people are on the wrong tack. The next step has already appeared. The next step is from being mere creatures to being sons of God. The new kind of man appeared in Christ, and other new men, little “christs,” already to be found sorted here and there about the earth. We Christians don’t call it “evolution” because we believe it isn’t something coming up out of blind Nature but something coming down from the world of light and power and knowledge beyond all Nature. But if you like to call it “evolution,” do. The next step is here. You can become one of the new men in Christ if you like. Or, if you prefer, you can refuse the step and sink back.